Recent Comments

  • sexy_pants on One Better: She understands the necessary mindset to be a PN!Sep 20, 21:33
  • sexy_pants on Long Yellow Top: Barely bottomless like her and very bottomless (exposing the navel and below) are both great styles!Sep 20, 21:32
  • deadpoolfan1 on Lusty Pirate: So much Sex! sounds like my future crew.Sep 20, 20:14
  • GOWK24 on Marvelous Bed: Yes, exactly. I realize it's not actually about a magic bed, I just think it could have been is all.Sep 20, 16:30
  • NudeWorldOrder on Marvelous Bed: Perhaps I'm misunderstanding myself, but I don't think anyone actually misunderstood this as a story about a magic bed, It's just that title suggests another possibility.Sep 20, 14:03
  • Daican-2 on Marvelous Bed: Where does it say or even imply the bed is magic or that any of the people who have slept on it registered permanude? She saw the bed in a store, discovered it was very comfortable, and for some reason she was strongly attracted to it -- maybe it reminded her of a bed she liked at her grandparents, perhaps it reminded her of a favourite childhood story, who knows? Nothing was said about other people registering. All that was suggested is that men found her more attractive and approachable as a happy naked woman than bundled up in clothes from neck to toes. Also, because she enjoys being seen nude, she is happier that she was when prudishly dressed, and this inner joy makes others want to be with her. Not magic, just normal human nature.Sep 20, 10:15
  • NudeWorldOrder on Marvelous Bed: I'm not usually a big fan of the "Sold my clothes to buy X" captions in general. It's an easy story idea, but not a very interesting one, IMHO.Sep 20, 00:10
  • sexy_pants on European Vacation: Her brothers don't need to strip? This seems like a massive oversight!Sep 19, 21:42
  • sexy_pants on Marvelous Bed: Agreed, the story as it's presented here stretches my suspension of disbelief too much for NWO.Sep 19, 21:41
  • Megamegatron99 on Lusty Pirate: Edit: Oh, and I completely forgot! Here is the original: https://twitter.com/kairunoburogu/status/1129157959274061825Sep 19, 17:57
  • Megamegatron99 on Lusty Pirate: Why a pirate themed caption today? Because September 19th is Talk Like a Pirate Day!Sep 19, 17:42
  • NudeWorldOrder on PN Art Class: Tineye turned up versions with a "PWFOTOS" watermark, so I searched for that, and found a blog by that name. And sure enough, searching for "art" yielded a post about this picture and the story behind it. https://pwfotos.com/2014/12/14/the-naked-art-class-nsfw-part-one-shooting-the-image/Sep 19, 16:57
  • Nobody Worth Knowing on Simple Explanation: What I find hard to believe is that I'm lucky enough to be your neighbor!Sep 19, 14:25
  • Gloria on PN Art Class: I have to ask. Where did this picture come from? It's funny, and appears staged. However, it doesn't look professional.Sep 19, 13:19
  • Nobody Worth Knowing on PN Art Class: "Pretty much just one color. No real textures." Wow. You need to get a better art teacher!Sep 19, 11:45
  • Gloria on European Vacation: I'm sure Europe will thoroughly enjoy your vacation.Sep 19, 00:22
  • NudeWorldOrder on No Ride: FYI, I changed this image after realizing it was the same photo as this submission, from last year. The new photo might change the context a bit, but you can still draw your own conclusions about what happened.Sep 18, 23:08
  • NudeWorldOrder on Tumblr Protest: Under the New Laws it would be illegal discrimination. I'd like to think in the NWO universe permanent nudity would have shifted general attitudes enough that the nudity ban never would have happened at all, but it's hard to say. My personally theory, IRL, is that it was really a cost-cutting measure, so their motivation wouldn't necessarily change I guess.Sep 18, 19:49
  • Anonymous on Tumblr Protest: Yeah tumblr wouldn't ban pn's, yeah right, delusion.Sep 18, 19:13
  • GOWK24 on Marvelous Bed: I kind of feel like this should be an "alt" or "Fantasy" story about a "magic bed" that seduces everyone who sleeps on it to be permanude.Sep 18, 17:30
  • blushingandready on Custom Dress: That looks...painful.Sep 18, 16:33
  • NudeWorldOrder on School Policy: Not sure if you're joking, but I'm pretty sure she meant she's spent a bit of time browsing the naughty boys section of the school website.Sep 17, 22:23
  • Nobody Worth Knowing on School Policy: They're putting her on the boys' section? I knew we needed better biology classes!Sep 17, 21:08
  • Nobody Worth Knowing on Golf Lessons: How weird! I don't care a bit about golf, but I'm thoroughly focused on your game.Sep 17, 13:31
  • Nobody Worth Knowing on Relationship Goals: It's not the funny stuff they have to worry about!Sep 17, 13:27
  • GOWK24 on Thirteen Reasons: That was immediately what I thought too and I was very confused...Sep 17, 11:27
  • NudeWorldOrder on Popular Skater: There is not. Presumably she's flying way off it in some sort of wicked cool stunt.Sep 17, 08:36
  • Megamegatron99 on Thirteen Reasons: "This is in no way correlated to the series titled 'Thirteen Reasons Why'." because upon reading the title of this, one of the things that came to mind was the title of that series, which I haven't watched,nor do I plan on watching it.Sep 17, 07:28
  • Anonymous on Popular Skater: Or is there a skate BOARD hidden by the text?Sep 17, 00:51
  • MLC777 on Thirteen Reasons: Start listing. I may or may not be listening, but I'll definitely be paying attention (aka watching.)Sep 17, 00:27
  • Nobody Worth Knowing on Popular Skater: Looks like she's come up with a way to save big money on skates, at least.Sep 16, 23:07
  • M.B. on Thirteen Reasons: Give us more than thirteen reasons, please.Sep 16, 18:18
  • NudeWorldOrder on Under Cover: That hairdo looks just a tad suspicious too, come to think of it. Very "dense", perfect for hiding a small device.Sep 16, 15:13
  • William Rice on No, Patches. Heel!: Thanx. I needed something funny today.Sep 16, 14:06
  • MLC777 on Registration Mistake: This is an example why upgrading a registration should be an easy process. For a small admin fee, agree to upgrade from topless to full PN and add a minimum of one year or 20% of the previous registered term (whichever is more.) Effective date of the full registered term is the date of the upgrade (the new registration starts over.) The idea of being able to register nude (or any portion of) is to get and keep women naked, not to keep them clothed.Sep 16, 12:12
  • Ekjetter on One Simple Reason: Wow. Talk about a stunning woman! And she's naked too!Sep 16, 12:09
  • MLC777 on One Simple Reason: Whatever gets her naked and keeps her that way is great. Even better is that she is encouraging many more women to do the same.Sep 16, 12:05
  • Josh F on Happy PN: It suits you so well. It’s great to see you are embracing it.Sep 16, 10:07
  • Josh F on CMNF Wedding: I love nude wedding pictures. Very beautiful bride. Believe it or not I have been to a nude wedding. It happened a very long time ago at a nude beach on a beautiful river.Sep 16, 09:39
  • That Lesbian Nudist Cult on Registration Mistake: Terrible. Forcing a woman to wear panties when her soul clearly yearns for freedom is cruel. And all because a simple mistake on her paperwork? Worthless beaurocrats, all of them.Sep 16, 01:27
  • Daican-2 on Industry Standard: I'm not surprised this standard has arisen; after all, they do say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery and the original Converse Model was an inspired campaign. You can see the original Converse Model at http://www.nudeworldorder.net/blog/7096/Sep 15, 23:01
  • blushingandready on Registration Mistake: A shame, she looks so elegant and graceful, yet the single piece if clothing is marring the look.Sep 15, 21:04
  • Nobody Worth Knowing on Industry Standard: And, if you've followed the history of advertising at all, that's completely unexpected!Sep 15, 19:16
  • NudeWorldOrder on Horrid Weather: I rather doubt it, but I can't confirm. Reverse image search didn't turn up too much, and what it did was mostly foreign. Couldn't find a name attached either. Seems like an actress nude (or even a fake of one) would probably get more attention.Sep 15, 17:37
  • MLC777 on Survival Training: Sounds like an interesting survival training course. Provided you survive and make it back, you'll be deemed worthy to continue working for that company. By the way, that paper you signed was a combination max term PN registration and a release of liability form (just in case you come to harm.) The question you may ask: Is there a safety monitor, making the survival issue figurative - or - is the survival issue real?Sep 15, 17:27
  • MLC777 on Permanude Olympics: Spell check: Olypics - OlympicsSep 15, 17:16
  • Josh F on Horrid Weather: Is this the actress who plays Dudley’s sister in Lodge 49? Yowza!Sep 15, 16:41
  • Josh F on Tennis Class: ‘Cause those beautiful girls got to be free!Sep 15, 16:36
  • Nobody Worth Knowing on Tennis Class: I think she signed up for a tennis class to learn new skills.Sep 15, 09:01
  • NudeWorldOrder on No Special Plans: I don't recall why it was marked that way, but the caption kind of implies she's topless some days but not others, which would mean she isn't registered and just lives somewhere toplessness is legal for everyone. But since that isn't specifically stated, I suppose you're right.Sep 15, 08:39
  • D on No Special Plans: This is not altSep 15, 03:00
  • Nobody Worth Knowing on Survival Training: The world is full of weirdos. Be careful.Sep 15, 00:16
  • Nuclear Finality on Tennis Class: I mean, she still has her shoes left to lose; so she's still in the game!Sep 14, 22:45
  • MLC777 on Tennis Class: Why does it exist? As another way to get women like you naked. Why did you sign up, without being able to play tennis and have any reasonable chance to not lose? Not so much about being dumb, it's due to you knowing deep down that you need to be naked.Sep 14, 15:08
  • That Lesbian Nudist Cult on Tennis Class: Because deep down, this is what you've wanted all along.Sep 14, 13:12
  • Ekjetter on One Request: I don't think it's a punishment. More like, mom wants her to be fashionable and perhaps going in your underwear, which wouldn't happen if a registration were in effect, would make a fashion statement. Obviously, the young lady doesn't see it that way, cause she views panties as intimate wear, but views total nudity as less intimate.Sep 14, 11:42
  • Anonymous on Horrid Weather: Poor girl. I’d be more than happy to stay with her and keep her companySep 14, 11:05
  • sexy_pants on Horrid Weather: Well, the minimum term is a year, and in that time bad weather is bound to happen.Sep 14, 10:05
  • Anonymous on Ariel: I agree with the two comments above.Sep 14, 01:36
  • NudeWorldOrder on Discussion: I, and also Daicain-2, use Haettenschweiler. Other contributors who do their own captioning use other fonts. There's certainly no rule about it, as long as it's readable, if that's why you were asking. Even I occasionally use others, for instance in this picture I used Andy.Sep 13, 22:25
  • Andy on Discussion: So which font is used for the pictures?Sep 13, 21:55
  • Some Guy on One Request: But is it still a punishment? I'm thinking if she was forced to wear a Minie Mouse panty, or a Power Puff Girl one, it would be way more effective as a punishment.Sep 13, 20:10
  • Anonymous on Ariel: I second this.Sep 13, 18:48
  • Iluvenf on Check it out: Right, can’t forget shotas.Sep 13, 17:42
  • Michael Kerner on Odd Bets: Strip Ping Pong, great idea.Sep 13, 12:28
  • Gloria on Opinions on age in drawn content: This is a very thorny problem. So long as the Permanude universe allows children to be stripped for punishment, we have a potential problem. As I said before, NWO always skates by showing older women as the school kid. Now, however, we're looking at Anime. There are very few old people in Anime. They are almost all young looking. I've seen a few that were very young looking. Some good points have been made that the world wide web is WORLD wide and different countries have different definitions for child ponography. Not perving on small children myself, or even young teenagers, I feel very unqualified to have an opinion since I love Anime for what it is. All that beating around the bush accepted, I'm afraid that I have to agree with the more conservitice posts here. I don't know if putting it behind a warning cover is good enough for Europe, but I'd hate to see this page dragged through the mud. Yes, I'm suggesting we self censor. I hate self censorship. However, as I've pointed out elsewhere, if I want to publish PN stories, I have to identify the people as eighteen or above within the first two pages or so. That's just the world we live in. Good luck in making a call, NWO. I know it's a bitch to have to.Sep 13, 09:10
  • MLC777 on Check it out: I knew a 30 year old mother of two who, from the neck down, could have modeled for this drawing. The face is cartoonish, so is meaningless. I see nothing here that says underage. If that is what is on the viewer's mind, they might imagine it that way.Sep 12, 21:40
  • Anonymous on Opinions on age in drawn content: It's probably fair to say that breast size is the only obvious indicator of age available. The presence of pubic hair would make an argument, but it's usually missing (presumed shaved). Any other indicator of age that I can think of could be considered an imperfection and thus be left out. If I'm wrong, so be it... but then again artists aren't always the greatest at depicting correct physiology, so I'm not sure how good a non-obvious answer is (seeing as the artist would also need to know that answer).Sep 12, 19:32
  • CaptainDuckman on Opinions on age in drawn content: By law here even cartoon depictions of minors count as child pornography if they can be considered in the broadest sense "sexual content". That's the same in more than a few countries, especially in Europe. In fact some countries go so far as to consider any depiction of a minor, photorealistic or not, to be considered child porn if according to a court "it could be arousing to a pedophile", which in the UK for example has led to people being arrested for taking photos of their own children during school sporting events because someone considered that the shorts and t-shirts could be enough to make the photos of interest to a pedophile (afaik no convictions came from that, but the stage is set).Sep 12, 18:46
  • Megamegatron99 on Check it out: or shotas (because of male tag)Sep 12, 16:26
  • Iluvenf on Check it out: I think you will be ok. As mentioned above anime designs tend to make characters look younger than they are. I think you would be ok so long as you don’t post things like loli’s (little girls).Sep 12, 16:06
  • NudeWorldOrder on Check it out: Just to be clear, there's no debate about nude pictures of real minors, at least as far as this blog is concerned. I don't want to host that. I have removed a few pictures for that reason in the past, including one that I consider and oversight on my part to have posted in the first place, and couple where I just couldn't be sure. But what you say is correct as far as I know. Those pictures were also completely innocent and I don't think they could reasonably construed as illegal. But don't believe it's right to mix that with the more overtly erotic content (spreadies and stuff) that exist in other pictures. So that policy definitely isn't changing. But there's a much bigger gray area when it comes to drawings, since they don't even have a real age to use as a bright line. So if you haven't already, make sure you vote in this poll, and please share any other thoughts you have specific to drawn images on the comments over there as well.Sep 12, 15:43
  • MLC777 on Not Sorry: And the next day she donates all her clothes to back up her commitment.Sep 12, 15:09
  • Anonymous on Opinions on age in drawn content: That's almost always the reason. Every time I've seen or posted a picture in any of the other groups I'm in (I personally happen to prefer smaller breasts and think that anything over C is too big) it's the breast size that starts it. I actually saw one guy one time say that all women have big breasts when they are adults and that only children have small breasts. It's almost a mentality that breast size directly equates to age. But as far as my knowledge of laws goes, if the drawing depicts a real, existing person that is a minor, then its illegal. But if it's a drawing of a fictional character, its classified as art instead of pornagraphy.Sep 12, 14:38
  • Anonymous on Check it out: It is a drawing, the breast size is small to the eye of the viewer. Which makes it in the grey zone. However it is a drawing not a real person. A photo of a real person, nude, underage and posed with the look of being posed to expose the sexual organs to the lens or committing a sexual act reserved for adults is the firm line of CP. Real Photos of underaged persons doing non sexual things like skinny dipping in the backyard pool or bathtub photos of growing up, while parts are showing but not primarily the focus point, more innocent like is okay in my book. The Supreme Court ruled “I know it when I see it” regarding child porn is very broad and in the viewer’s opinion. Just like a passing gas with sound among friends in the back yard is one thing, passing gas loudly in a church during the service is another and may not be acceptable. While not a lawyer drawings are okay, real photos exposing the parts may not fly for underaged persons may not flySep 12, 14:33
  • grumbo on Opinions on age in drawn content: I've voted for hidden, because of the difficulty of saying exactly how young-looking is too young-looking. I also don't want things things to get too difficult for the creators. There are still limits, though, and I really think the linked picture goes beyond those limits. The warning seems like the best compromise.Sep 12, 13:42
  • Megamegatron99 on Opinions on age in drawn content: Despite what I voted on the pole, If enough people are against it, then I completely support a new tag that people can toggle the visibility of, or whatever... cause hidden is better than completely banned. Also, It is worth noting that no one said anything about this: http://www.nudeworldorder.net/blog/10729/ and essentially the only difference is the chest!Sep 12, 13:01
  • Nobody Worth Knowing on Broken Washer: That's an amazingly quick diagnosis! Are you secretly the Maytag Repairman?Sep 12, 12:57
  • sexy_pants on Not Sorry: Good for her for sticking to her guns! When she leaves home she will definitely register right away to show she's independent from parental rules.Sep 12, 10:45
  • sexy_pants on One Request: The mom definitely understands: there's nothing *wrong* about being naked, it's just the absence of artificial clothing!Sep 12, 10:44
  • sexy_pants on Nothing New: Taking pictures of the permanude to preserve the memory are important! What if later they foolishly decide to cover their bodies again?Sep 12, 10:43
  • NudeWorldOrder on Check it out: Thank you for this more thoughtful response. (For transparency, I declined to publish a previous one which was, let's say, not very constructive.) What you suggest might be a good solution. I'm just a little reluctant to start making "rules" until I'm sure they're necessary, because rules tend to proliferate and take the fun out of things. Regarding the legal issue, I don't think this would actually be illegal in vary many places since it doesn't show any sexual activity. And as you've probably gathered I don't personally find it offensive either, to me it's "just a drawing", pure fiction, and what it depicts—a girl who (despite the caption) does look very young—happily prancing around naked doesn't evoke disgust on any level. I'm not sure why would or should. But that's not to say I think it necessarily needs to be here either, and I'm sympathetic to the fact some people do find it distasteful. What I need to figure out is whether that's the opinion of a vocal minority, or whether in fact a significant number of readers would prefer to avoid seeing anything like this. If enough people feel that way, then removing or hiding this and any similar images would seem justified. I was hoping for a few more responses here. Perhaps I need to do a separate post about the issue.Sep 12, 02:48
  • Captionman on Check it out: @NWO Well, I do not seem to be the only one who sees a problem in such pictures. Incidentally, the prosecution in many countries also sees a problem in it. Why am I so sensitive to this topic? For one thing it is disgusting and for another it is dangerous! Counter-question: Who is crazy enough to upload Captions to a site that also has content that makes it illegal for a lot of international users to call it by accident? The Internet is not limited to the scope of US law. Who calls your page is treated according to the laws of their own country! The world is NOT a village! Compromise: Would it be possible to not display such images on your main page, but to provide the article entry with a warning. So that one gets these pictures displayed only if one calls the appropriate article? In that case, I might decide to submit Captions to you again.Sep 12, 00:32
  • Megamegatron99 on Check it out: Edit: Offtopic, but the artist of this pic, did indeed make alternate versions of it. (said alternates can also be found on Gelbooru)Sep 11, 15:21
  • Megamegatron99 on Check it out: If I may, my contribution to this conversation is the gelbooru source: https://gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=3962337 the character is apparently supposed to be Lana (Japanese name: Suiren) from Pokemon. And I personally agree with what you said, Ekjetter. Note: This picture is also being discussed in the NWO Discord, btw.Sep 11, 15:18
  • MLC777 on Broken Washer: Who unplugged the washing machine? (That the only reason it "broke down.")Sep 11, 14:50
  • Ekjetter on Check it out: I'll admit that she looks a bit too young, but it's also an artist's rendition. She can look whatever age the artist was going for. That being said, there are girls out they're who are 21, 22 and even a little older, who look younger than they are. It's the exception, not the rule, but it does happen and since it does happen, it makes the caption believable. If she had larger breasts in the image, would she still look too young?Sep 11, 14:15
  • WishIWasNaked on Interesting Loophole: The wet spot will give her away and she'll be sentenced to full nudity for clearly exploiting the PN laws. That said, after she's stripped totally naked she should feel free to keep "adjusting her zipper" in public. It's perfectly normal, natural, and beautiful. And everyone will admire her confidence to do so out in the open.Sep 11, 11:00
  • JustSayin on Siblings on Vacation: Honestly, I find that guy to be so hot, I’d gladly register to be his naked footstool.Sep 11, 09:22
  • sexy_pants on Interesting Loophole: She's sure adjusting her zipper a lot...Sep 11, 09:16
  • NudeWorldOrder on Check it out: I definitely agree she looks too young for the caption. Does anyone else think this is a problem/agree it should be removed? Thus far I haven't really gotten enough drawn submissions to have a policy on this, but I have been getting more lately, so it might be a good time to have that discussion.Sep 11, 09:00
  • grumbo on Check it out: It says 'back in college', but this picture really looks... uncomfortably young, OK? It might be best to remove this one.Sep 11, 07:52
  • Anonymous on Siblings on Vacation: I find it hard to believe that in a world where people can register for public nudity, the government can use forced nudity as a punishment and parents can do the same to their children that this girl never saw a penis before that day.Sep 11, 05:23
  • Anonymous on Ariel: Need more celebrity stories where they give up clothes.Sep 10, 22:29
  • MLC777 on Siblings on Vacation: That was my thought also.Sep 10, 15:43
  • MLC777 on Say Cheese: Not to worry. You're not currently showing any more than you would in a micro bikini with your back turned. Now either turn around or bend over and spread, and then we can talk about exposure.Sep 10, 15:41
  • Nobody Worth Knowing on In Your Car: And the tan lines you get will drive people nuts!Sep 10, 14:19
  • Daican-2 on Siblings on Vacation: Only one extra day? I would have thought such an obvious flouting of the intent would involve a stronger punishment - like the rest of the vacation. And if she continues, an extension into the school year.Sep 10, 12:23
  • sexy_pants on Opinion Needed: Might be hard to know unless they're bottomless too.Sep 10, 09:32
  • sexy_pants on Say Cheese: Can't really tell the difference in a picture!Sep 10, 09:30

DMCA / Report Abuse